Top 1 Pain Point: “Scammers will exploit this to drain wallets via prompt injections.” Raw entrepreneur quotes: - “Top objection: ‘Scammers will exploit this to drain wallets via prompt injections.’ … Stop selling innovation. Start selling trust. ‘Built on Google’s Agent Payment Protocol and Coinbase’s x402’ should’ve been line one.” (Post 27) - “For the past few months, I have been building in the enterprise agent space… We have landed an enterprise contract for ~$250K and our product is 90% complete.” (Post 3) - “I hired a developer at the end to audit everything especially security” (Post 1) - “People who interacted with it thought it was a real human.” (Post 18) Opportunity: AgentPay Firewall + Bonded Insurance for AI agent transactions - What it is: A “Stripe Radar for agents” that sits between agent frameworks (Google Agent Payment Protocol, Coinbase x402, Vapi/voice agents) and payment rails. It enforces spending policies, detects prompt-injection/role-jailbreak patterns, hot-transfers high-risk events to human review in <60s, and offers optional loss coverage (bonded). - Pricing to prove pain: 0.6% per authorized transaction + $799/mo platform fee. Optional fraud-loss coverage up to $50k/mo for +$499–$1,499/mo depending on risk tier. First 10 Customers: - Head of Risk/Trust & Safety at agentic fintechs piloting autonomous payments. - Head of Product at AI agent startups integrating Google Agent Payment Protocol or Coinbase x402. - VP Engineering at contact-center AI vendors adding “pay-by-voice”/hot-transfer with card-on-file. - Platform PMs at wallets/exchanges launching agent wallets (x402). - CTOs of marketplaces adding autonomous procurement/expense bots. MVP in 48 Hours: - Cloudflare Worker or lightweight reverse proxy that wraps x402/Agent Payment Protocol test endpoints. - Notion-hosted policy builder (merchant/category whitelist, spend caps, time-of-day, 3D Secure requirement). - Prompt-injection heuristics (open-source filters) + manual “risk desk” via Slack for flagged approvals. - Demo sandbox: simulate injection attempts and show blocked/approved paths; bind a test Coinbase x402 sandbox wallet. Justification: - Demand: Clear, repeated fear and enterprise readiness. - “Scammers will exploit this to drain wallets via prompt injections.” (Post 27) - “We have landed an enterprise contract for ~$250K…” (Post 3) → agents are going live with money flows now. - “I hired a developer… to audit… security.” (Post 1) - ROI: Prevents a single $10k–$50k agent-triggered fraud from killing a pilot; accelerates enterprise approvals by giving Risk/Compliance a control point and insurance. Faster sales cycles = huge ROI. - Scalable: Protocol-level middleware + rules engine. Integrations with x402/Agent Payment Protocol give distribution. Data network effects from shared fraud signatures (prompt-injection patterns). - Purple Cow/Controversial: You’re not another “agent.” You insure and underwrite them. Saying “We’ll pay if your agent gets duped” is shocking and unlocks enterprise trust. First-mover advantage on brand-new protocols (Google Agent Payment Protocol, Coinbase x402). Top 2 Pain Point: “The room lit up when folks started trading war stories—what’s actually breaking in billing… usage-based, hybrid, and milestone models.” (Post 18) Opportunity: MeterGuard — Shadow Billing + Contract Copilot for Usage-Based SaaS (pre-invoice simulation, anomaly detection, and clause-level compliance checks) - What it is: A “billing observability” layer that ingests raw metering events (Segment/Kafka), reconstructs invoices independently of Stripe/Chargebee/Zuora, flags over/under-billing, simulates next month’s bills, and uses AI to check contract edge cases (caps, minimums, prepaid drawdowns, milestones). - Pricing: $1,500 onboarding + 0.2% of metered revenue (or $1 per 1,000 usage events), with “we find leakage or we credit $5,000” guarantee. First 10 Customers: - CFO/VP Finance at usage-based SaaS (APIs, data infra, dev tools) with 50–500 employees. - Head of RevOps/Finance Ops at Series A–C SaaS shifting to hybrid pricing (seat + usage). - Billing/Finance teams replacing spreadsheets/manual checks across Stripe/Chargebee/Metronome. - Controllers at fintech and marketplace platforms with milestone billing. MVP in 48 Hours: - Retool dashboard + Python script to ingest sample CSVs (events, contracts, invoices) and run 10 checks (duplicate events, missing usage, over-cap charges, minimums not met, tier crossover errors). - Stripe test-mode connection; generate a “shadow invoice” vs. actual; produce a PDF anomaly report; 1 live working session to validate. - Do it manually first; productize recurring checks after 3 pilots. Justification: - Demand (direct quotes): - “Trading war stories—what’s actually breaking in billing…” (Post 18) - “Wrestling with real-world billing complexity at scale usage-based, hybrid, and milestone models.” (Post 18) - “AI is driving… invoicing automation… revenue forecasting and compliance checks.” (Post 18) - ROI: Typical 1–3% revenue leakage recaptured; for $20M ARR, that’s $200k–$600k/year. Fewer disputes → lower DSO by 5–10 days; less eng time babysitting billing (save 0.5–1 FTE). - Scalable: Horizontal need across every consumption SaaS; lightweight data connectors; usage-based pricing aligns with value. Services-light after integration. - Purple Cow/Controversial: A “shadow biller” that audits the sacred billing pipeline before invoices go out—and guarantees to find money or pay you—is bold. AI reading contract clauses (caps/minimums) for billing correctness is a 2025-only edge. Top 3 Pain Point: “Our CTO is reviewing literally every PR and it’s becoming a bottleneck… Our budget is $500–800/mo.” Raw entrepreneur quotes: - “our CTO is reviewing literally every pr and it's becoming a bottleneck, sometimes it takes 2 days to get feedback” (Post 26) - “We need something that can catch the obvious stuff” (Post 26) - “our budget is probably $500-800/month max” (Post 26) - “we made it 16x faster and it costs us 20-25% less… Moral… going cheap on compute isn't always the most cost effective decision.” (Post 9) Opportunity: PR Triage Copilot — Budget-friendly AI code review that gates PRs with real checks (not vibes) - What it is: A GitHub App that runs LLM diff review + Semgrep/CodeQL + test impact analysis. It leaves inline comments, blocks PRs on policy failures (security/PII/secrets/perf anti-patterns), and summarizes for the CTO so they only review what matters. - Pricing to prove pain: $20/dev seat or $699/mo per org (whichever is lower up to 40 devs). Optional self-hosted runner + SOC2 pack +$300/mo. First 10 Customers: - CTOs at 5–20 dev B2B SaaS teams raising/just raised seed. - Heads of Engineering at YC/SaaS companies with 50–200 PRs/month. - Founding Engineers in healthcare/fintech needing “obvious issues” caught pre-CTO review. - Agencies with 3–10 concurrent client repos needing consistent PR hygiene. MVP in 48 Hours: - Probot-based GitHub App + GitHub Actions workflow. - Wire LLM (Claude/OpenAI) to analyze diffs and leave inline comments; run Semgrep ruleset for security/quality; basic flaky-test detector; status check with pass/fail threshold. - For first pilots, do “human-in-the-loop” on top of the bot (manual review behind the scenes) to guarantee signal. - Simple dashboard (Retool) showing PRs reviewed, issues caught, CTO time saved. Justification: - Demand: - “CTO is reviewing literally every pr… bottleneck.” (Post 26) - “We need something that can catch the obvious stuff” at <$1k/mo. (Post 26) - ROI: - Free 8–12 CTO hours/week = ~$4k–$8k/month of senior time reallocated to architecture/recruiting. - Catching one security secret or perf footgun early saves days to weeks. Post 9 reinforces that smart infra decisions materially drop costs. - Scalable: - GitHub Marketplace distribution, low COGS per PR, horizontal across all languages/orgs. - Add-ons: repo-specific “memory,” compliance packs, coverage gates → ARPU lift without people-heavy ops. - Purple Cow/Controversial: - Most AI tools focus on writing code (Copilot). Few commit to gating PRs with a budget founders accept today. You deliberately undercut enterprise tools and promise “PR noise < 15%” or money back.