Pain Point #1: "I'm trying to build and ship an MVP for a productivity idea fast. I've tried exploring Bolt, Loveable, Bloom, etc., however I'm unsure if these apps do a good enough job to actually ship the app to an end user." Opportunity: Create a one-stop AI-driven MVP builder specifically tailored for non-technical founders, integrating seamless deployment and functionality assurance. Justification: - Demand: The poster expresses frustration with existing tools, indicating a gap in the market for a reliable solution. Given the rise in solo entrepreneurs and non-technical founders, this tool would have a broad appeal. - ROI: By streamlining the MVP process, founders can see results quickly, moving from idea to market with less resource waste and allowing faster validation. - Scalable: AI tools can handle diverse MVP needs across industries, allowing for multitude licenses and subscription models without significant bottlenecks. - Purple Cow/Controversial: A solution that delivers quality MVPs without requiring technical chops is both unique and disruptive, breaking the traditional boundary between tech and non-tech founders. --- Pain Point #2: "I have a product that's been developed...but I'm quickly realising I'm not going to be able to [handle the business side]. I'm insanely stressed by everything to the point where it's affecting my health." Opportunity: Offer a specialized consultancy service that provides end-to-end business development for technical founders, including interim management and hands-on operational support until profitability. Justification: - Demand: Numerous posts reveal a pattern of technically skilled entrepreneurs struggling with the business aspects; this service relieves that pain point directly. - ROI: This service allows founders to focus on their strengths while qualified professionals handle the business, accelerating time to market and increasing the likelihood of success. - Scalable: The model can expand across regions and industries, adapting to various sectors with custom solutions for technical founders. - Purple Cow/Controversial: The concept of "outsourcing the founder role" is unconventional but could disrupt traditional entrepreneurship by lowering the barrier for launching successful companies. --- Pain Point #3: "I am currently building a tool which is essentially product hunt for failed startups where after launch we received a whole bunch of DMs from people asking us if they could list their failed startups for sale." Opportunity: Develop a marketplace specifically for buying and selling failed startups, offering comprehensive due diligence and analysis tools to ensure buyers understand the potential for turnaround or asset utilization. Justification: - Demand: As seen in the poster's DMs, there's apparent interest in providing a structured way to capitalize on failed ventures, appealing to bargain hunters and turnaround specialists. - ROI: Acquiring failed startups cheaply could yield significant returns if pivot or asset reallocation is successful, offering high-risk but high-reward opportunities. - Scalable: This marketplace can extend globally, with potential buyers and sellers across all technological and geographical boundaries. - Purple Cow/Controversial: The idea of commoditizing failed ventures as assets is innovative and challenges the notion of what it means to "fail," turning negatives into potential new beginnings for other entrepreneurs.